Amulya Charan Sarkar and Others Vs Amrita Lal Mukherjee

Calcutta High Court 9 Jun 1920 (1920) 06 CAL CK 0005
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Walmsley, J; Greaves, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

Walmsley, J.@mdashSo far as I can understand the fasts of this case, it appears to me that, probably, the provisions of Section 145, Criminal Procedure Code, offered the Magistrate the best means of settling the dispute between the two parties. But in view of the Full Bench decision in the case of Emperor v. Abbas 12 Ind. Cas. 833 : 39 C. 160 : 14 C.L.J. 429 : 16 C.W.N. 83 : 12 Cr.L.J. 569 I do not think it is open to this Court to say that the Magistrate must proceed u/s 145 and not u/s 107, Criminal Procedure Code. As the Magistrate has exercised his discretion I think we are not entitled to interfere. I, therefore, discharge this Rule.

Greaves, J.

2. I agree.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Upholds Stay on ICC Arbitration in Oman-India Border Security Dispute, Dismisses MSA Global’s Appeal
Dec
27
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Upholds Stay on ICC Arbitration in Oman-India Border Security Dispute, Dismisses MSA Global’s Appeal
Read More
Bombay High Court: Profit from Margin Glitch Not Unjust Enrichment in Kotak Securities Case
Dec
27
2025

Court News

Bombay High Court: Profit from Margin Glitch Not Unjust Enrichment in Kotak Securities Case
Read More