Amulya Charan Sarkar and Others Vs Amrita Lal Mukherjee

Calcutta High Court 9 Jun 1920 (1920) 06 CAL CK 0005
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Walmsley, J; Greaves, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

Walmsley, J.@mdashSo far as I can understand the fasts of this case, it appears to me that, probably, the provisions of Section 145, Criminal Procedure Code, offered the Magistrate the best means of settling the dispute between the two parties. But in view of the Full Bench decision in the case of Emperor v. Abbas 12 Ind. Cas. 833 : 39 C. 160 : 14 C.L.J. 429 : 16 C.W.N. 83 : 12 Cr.L.J. 569 I do not think it is open to this Court to say that the Magistrate must proceed u/s 145 and not u/s 107, Criminal Procedure Code. As the Magistrate has exercised his discretion I think we are not entitled to interfere. I, therefore, discharge this Rule.

Greaves, J.

2. I agree.

From The Blog
Rajasthan High Court Raps Axis Bank for Encashing FD Without Court Permission, Orders Refund
Dec
12
2025

Court News

Rajasthan High Court Raps Axis Bank for Encashing FD Without Court Permission, Orders Refund
Read More
FEMA Compliance for NRI Family Trusts: Legal Clarity on Corpus, Beneficiaries, and Repatriation
Dec
12
2025

Court News

FEMA Compliance for NRI Family Trusts: Legal Clarity on Corpus, Beneficiaries, and Repatriation
Read More