Amulya Charan Sarkar and Others Vs Amrita Lal Mukherjee

Calcutta High Court 9 Jun 1920 (1920) 06 CAL CK 0005
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Walmsley, J; Greaves, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

Walmsley, J.@mdashSo far as I can understand the fasts of this case, it appears to me that, probably, the provisions of Section 145, Criminal Procedure Code, offered the Magistrate the best means of settling the dispute between the two parties. But in view of the Full Bench decision in the case of Emperor v. Abbas 12 Ind. Cas. 833 : 39 C. 160 : 14 C.L.J. 429 : 16 C.W.N. 83 : 12 Cr.L.J. 569 I do not think it is open to this Court to say that the Magistrate must proceed u/s 145 and not u/s 107, Criminal Procedure Code. As the Magistrate has exercised his discretion I think we are not entitled to interfere. I, therefore, discharge this Rule.

Greaves, J.

2. I agree.

From The Blog
Foreign Shares Not Reported in Schedule FA: Legal Consequences, Scenarios, and What Taxpayers Must Do
Jan
08
2026

Court News

Foreign Shares Not Reported in Schedule FA: Legal Consequences, Scenarios, and What Taxpayers Must Do
Read More
CCI Cracks Down on Collusive Bidding in Defence Tender: Why Fair Competition Protects Price Discovery
Jan
08
2026

Court News

CCI Cracks Down on Collusive Bidding in Defence Tender: Why Fair Competition Protects Price Discovery
Read More