Gram Panchayat Vs Commissioner, Ambala Division and Others

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 20 Apr 2007 (2007) 04 P&H CK 0031
Bench: Division Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Nirmal Yadav, J; Jasbir Singh, J

Acts Referred
  • Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 - Section 7

Judgement Text

Translate:

Jasbir Singh, J.@mdashBy filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made to quash order Annexure P/5 dated 14.6.2004 and order Annexure P/6 dated 10.10.2006.

2. It is apparent from the records that respondent No. 6 filed an application u/s 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (as applicable to Haryana)(in short, the Act), against respondent Nos. 3 to 5, for their ejectment, by alleging that they were in unauthorized occupation of Gram Panchayat''s land. The petitioner - Gram Panchayat was also arrayed as one of the respondents. By taking note of the entries made in the revenue record, the Collector, vide order Annexure P/5 ordered that it is not possible to eject the respondents, referred to above, as in the revenue record, land is shown as their ownership. The Collector also noted argument of the Gram Panchayat that, actually the Gram Panehayat was the owner, the entries in revenue record were wrong and changed without any justification, the Collector ordered that let the question of title be decide first and matter, regarding ejectment be taken up thereafter. The Commissioner, vide order Annexure P/6, upheld the order Annexure P/5 and directed that question of title be decided u/s 13-A of the Act and for the said purpose, the parties were directed to appear before the Collector concerned. Counsel states that the proceedings are pending before the Collector. No case is made out for interference on merits. However, keeping in view facts of this case, the Collector is directed to dispose of the pending litigation in an expeditious manner, preferably within six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order.

Disposed of.

From The Blog
Madras High Court Declares Hostels Are Residential Properties, Not Commercial: No Higher Tax or Tariff Allowed
Nov
13
2025

Court News

Madras High Court Declares Hostels Are Residential Properties, Not Commercial: No Higher Tax or Tariff Allowed
Read More
Punjab & Haryana High Court: Income Tax Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid After Section 143(3) Assessment
Nov
13
2025

Court News

Punjab & Haryana High Court: Income Tax Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid After Section 143(3) Assessment
Read More