Andeep Singh Vs Pawan Kumar

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 20 May 2014 Crl. Revision No. 1183 of 2014 (O and M) (2014) 05 P&H CK 0262
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Crl. Revision No. 1183 of 2014 (O and M)

Hon'ble Bench

Rekha Mittal, J

Advocates

Parshan Bansal, Advocate for the Appellant; Sumit Dua, Advocate for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI) - Section 138, 147

Judgement Text

Translate:

Rekha Mittal, J.

CRM-16175 of 2014

1. Allowed as prayed for.

CRM-16176 of 2014

2. Prayer in this application is for compounding the offence punishable u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by invoking the provisions of Section 147 thereof.

3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has discharged his liability qua the cheque amount in favour of the respondent as well as deposited 15 % of the cheque amount in the Registry of this Court in compliance with the judgment passed by Hon''ble the Supreme Court of India in Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H. 2010 (2) R.C.R. (Criminal) 851, therefore, the petitioner may be allowed to compound the offence.

4. Counsel for the respondent has conceded to the factual assertions that the petitioner has already discharged his liability qua the cheque amount by payment of sum of Rs. 2,80,000/-.

5. In view of the above, the petition is allowed, the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the courts below are set aside and the petitioner is acquitted of the offence, having been compounded.

From The Blog
Legal & Regulatory Challenges: India vs USA
Nov
17
2025

Court News

Legal & Regulatory Challenges: India vs USA
Read More
Supreme Court to Hear Sahara Employees’ Plea for Pending Salaries Amid SEBI Refund Case
Nov
17
2025

Court News

Supreme Court to Hear Sahara Employees’ Plea for Pending Salaries Amid SEBI Refund Case
Read More