Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Suraj Udyog Ltd.

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 1 Apr 2003 Central Excise Case No. 88 of 2001 (2003) 04 P&H CK 0043
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Central Excise Case No. 88 of 2001

Hon'ble Bench

N.K. Sud, J; N.K. Sodhi, J

Advocates

Kamal Sehgal, for the Appellant; Jagmohan Bansal, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 - Section 35H, 35L

Judgement Text

Translate:

N.K. Sodhi, J.@mdashThis is a petition filed by the Revenue u/s 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short ''the Act'') for a mandamus requiring the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi to refer the questions of law which according to the Department arise from the order of the Tribunal dated 8-8-2000.

2. We have perused the order dated 8-8-2000 passed by the Tribunal and find that one of the questions raised before it pertained to valuation of the goods for the purpose of levying excise duty. On a conjoint reading of the provisions of Sections 35H and 35L of the Act, we are of the view that the present petition is not maintainable and the only remedy which is available to the Department is to file an appeal before the Supreme Court under Clause (b) of Section 35L of the Act.

3. Consequently, the petition is dismissed.

From The Blog
Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Read More
Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Read More