T.P.S. Mann, J.@mdashPrayer made in the petition is for quashing of FIR No. 151 dated 17.12.2010 under Sections
406/420/465/467/468/471/120-B IPC registered at Police Station Kotkapura Sadar, District Faridkot.
2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of an application submitted by respondent-Baldev Singh wherein he stated that the
petitioners cheated him of an amount of Rs. 8,00,000/- on the pretext of sending his son Gursewak Singh abroad and also forged other
documents. Neither his son was sent to a foreign country nor the money paid by him was returned to him.
3. The quashing of the FIR is sought on the basis of compromise. Accordingly, while issuing notice, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order
dated 12.3.2014 directed the parties to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded. Pursuant to the same,
report has been received from Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridkot wherein it stands mentioned that the petitioners suffered their joint
statements to the effect that they had effected a compromise with respondents-Baldev Singh and Gursewak Singh. The original of the compromise
and the affidavits of respondents-Baldev Singh and Gursewak Singh stood appended with the present petition. The petitioners also stated that they
alongwith respondents-Baldev Singh and Gursewak Singh had signed the compromise after admitting the same as correct. The compromise had
taken place with their free will and consent and not the result of any pressure or undue influence. They wanted to live in peace and harmony with
respondents-Baldev Singh and Gursewak Singh. Similarly, respondents-Baldev Singh and Gursewak Singh also made their joint statements to the
effect that they had heard the statements of the petitioners, which were correct. They, further, stated that with the help of the Panchayat and the
respectables, the compromise stood effected between the parties. They also stated that they had signed the compromise deed as well as sworn in
their respective affidavits confirming the factum of compromise. In view of the compromise, they did not want to proceed any further against the
petitioners and would have no objection if the FIR lodged at the instance of respondent-Baldev Singh was quashed and all the proceedings arising
therefrom set-aside.
4. While submitting its report, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridkot has expressed satisfaction that the compromise stood arrived at
between the parties with their free will and consent. Written compromise was a genuinely executed document and there was no element of any
threat, coercion or pressure of any kind. Alongwith the report, the Magistrate has appended the photocopies of the statements made by the
petitioners as well as respondents No. 2 and 3.
5. Some of the offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioners are non-compoundable. However, when the parties have amicably
settled their differences and entered into a compromise followed by the parties appearing before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate and
getting their statements recorded confirming the aforementioned facts, this Court is of the considered view that inherent powers u/s 482 Cr.P.C.
can be exercised so as to quash the FIR.
6. Resultantly, the petition is accepted, FIR No. 151 dated 17.12.2010 under Sections 406/420/465/467/468/471/120-B IPC registered at
Police Station Kotkapura Sadar, District Faridkot is quashed and all the proceedings arising there from set-aside.