Golam Rahaman Mondal Vs Srimati Sabekjan Bibi

Calcutta High Court 14 Jun 1926 (1926) 06 CAL CK 0002
Bench: Division Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Cammiade, J; B.B. Ghose, J

Acts Referred
  • Registration Act, 1908 - Section 77

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. In this case we are of opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to put his own valuation of the suit. The suit is not with regard to any land or interest in land. The sole object of the suit was to get a certain documant registered. It was brought u/s 77 of the Indian Registration Act. The plaintiff valued the suit at the value of the property as mentioned in the document. Under the circumstances we are of opinion that the learned Munsif had full jurisdiction to deal with the matter. The Rule is, therefore, made absolute and the case is sent back to the Court of first instance for hearing on the merits.

2. The petitioner is entitled to his costs of this Rule Hearing-fee, two gold mohurs, costs of the lower Courts will abide the final result.

From The Blog
Calcutta High Court Quashes EPFO Order Denying Higher Pension to SAIL Staff, Calls It ‘Abuse of Law’
Nov
21
2025

Court News

Calcutta High Court Quashes EPFO Order Denying Higher Pension to SAIL Staff, Calls It ‘Abuse of Law’
Read More
Supreme Court Rejects Quota for Civil Judges in District Judge Promotions, Issues Fresh Rules on Seniority
Nov
21
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Rejects Quota for Civil Judges in District Judge Promotions, Issues Fresh Rules on Seniority
Read More