Gopal Mahajan and Another Vs The Authorized Officer, State Bank of Patiala, Himachal Pradesh and Another

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 3 Apr 2012 Case No. C.R. No. 6940 of 2011 (2012) 04 P&H CK 0096
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Case No. C.R. No. 6940 of 2011

Hon'ble Bench

L.N. Mittal, J

Advocates

R.K. Handa, for the Appellant; Deepak Thapar, for the Respondent

Judgement Text

Translate:

L.N. Mittal, J.@mdashCounsel for the petitioners, after seeking instructions from petitioner No. 1, who is present in person in the Court, states that petitioners shall pay Rs. 10,00,000/- within one month from today and Rs. 5,00,000/- within next one month thereafter and would clear the entire balance due amount within one year from today and shall, during this period, pay minimum amount of Rs. 3,00,000/- per month after the aforesaid two instalments, failing which the revision petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed. Counsel for the respondents expresses his inability to accept the aforesaid offer citing administrative difficulty.

2. Respondents should be interested in recovering their amount instead of resorting to coercive process, which may take longer time to recover the due amount. The offer made by the petitioners is very reasonable and fair. It would save the petitioners from coercive process and respondents would also be able to realize their due amount sooner than later without resorting to litigation or coercive process. Thus, it would serve the ends of both the parties. Accordingly, the instant revision petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid offer made by counsel for the petitioners.

From The Blog
Calcutta High Court Quashes EPFO Order Denying Higher Pension to SAIL Staff, Calls It ‘Abuse of Law’
Nov
21
2025

Court News

Calcutta High Court Quashes EPFO Order Denying Higher Pension to SAIL Staff, Calls It ‘Abuse of Law’
Read More
Supreme Court Rejects Quota for Civil Judges in District Judge Promotions, Issues Fresh Rules on Seniority
Nov
21
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Rejects Quota for Civil Judges in District Judge Promotions, Issues Fresh Rules on Seniority
Read More