Joginder Singh Vs State of Punjab

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 15 Jan 2003 Criminal Revision No. 85 of 1992 (2003) 01 P&H CK 0053
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Revision No. 85 of 1992

Hon'ble Bench

R.L. Anand, J

Advocates

G.K. Hundal, for the Appellant; G.S. Gill, D.A.G., for the Respondent

Acts Referred
  • Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Section 401
  • Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 34, 423, 468, 471

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

R.L. Anand, J.@mdashThe learned counsel for the petitioner has not challenged the conviction of the petitioner but has only prayed that he is not the main accused as he was only the attesting witness of the sale deed. The main accused was the brother of the complainant. The petitioner is an old man and he has already undergone more than one month''s sentence and, therefore, he may be visited with leniency in the matter of sentence. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection so far as the reduction of the sentence is concerned which is hereby reduced to four months. The imposition of fine is not disturbed.

2. With this modification in the matter of sentence, the revision stands disposed of.

From The Blog
ITAT Mumbai Says Stock Write-Down Cannot Be Disallowed Without Evidence, Remands Case for Fresh Hearing
Nov
22
2025

Court News

ITAT Mumbai Says Stock Write-Down Cannot Be Disallowed Without Evidence, Remands Case for Fresh Hearing
Read More
Bombay High Court Rules Arbitrators Lose Mandate If Proceedings Are Suspended Over Fee Disputes
Nov
22
2025

Court News

Bombay High Court Rules Arbitrators Lose Mandate If Proceedings Are Suspended Over Fee Disputes
Read More