Sandeep Vs State of Haryana

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 3 Mar 2011 Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-6213 of 2011
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-6213 of 2011

Hon'ble Bench

Rajan Gupta, J

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred

Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25, 54, 59#Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 439#Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 120B, 148, 149, 216, 302

Judgement Text

Translate:

Rajan Gupta, J.@mdashThis is a petition u/s 439 Code of Criminal Procedure .seeking regular bail in a case registered against thePetitioner under

Sections 148, 149, 302, 307, 120B, 216, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC & 25/54/59 of the Arms Act vide FIR No. 451 dated 27.11.2008,

police station Sadar Bahadurgarh.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner contends that Petitioner has been in custody since 28.1.2009 and trial of the case is still pending. The

Petitioner is thus, entitled to be enlarged on bail.

3. According to allegations levelled in the FIR, the applicant, namely, Sandeep, who was employed as a Warden in Bhondsi Jail, is stated to have

participated in a conspiracy to commit murder of Karan Singh in connivance with certain hardcore criminals lodged in jail. In the investigation, the

name of the Petitioner emerged on the mbasis of disclosure statement made by Sanjay on 27.1.2009that he supplied two SIM cards and Rs.

15,000/- to the Petitioner for providing the same to accused Manipal, who was lodged in Bhondsi Jail in connection with some other criminal case.

4. Under the circumstances, I am of the considered view that Petitioner is not entitled to concession of regular bail.

Dismissed.

From The Blog
Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Read More
Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Read More