Jasbir Kaur and Others Vs Jaswant Singh and Others

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 11 Dec 1989 F.A.O. No. 201 of 1985 (1990) 1 ACC 382 : (1990) ACJ 772
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

F.A.O. No. 201 of 1985

Hon'ble Bench

Amarjeet Chaudhary, J

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Amarjeet Chaudhary, J.@mdashThis appeal is directed against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ferozepur (for short ''the

Tribunal''), dated 4.12.1984 granting compensation to the claimants to the tune of Rs. 1,15,200/-. The award has been challenged on the ground

that as per documentary evidence, Sukhdev Singh, at the time of the fatal accident, was drawing Rs. 1,004.70 as his monthly salary. The Tribunal,

contrary to the evidence, has wrongly held by saying that the deceased was spending more than Rs. 400/-p.m. on himself. The brief facts leading

to the filing of this appeal are that Sukhdev Singh (deceased), who was a police Head Constable, was killed in a road accident on 8.3.1983. The

heirs of the deceased filed claim application in the Tribunal, claiming Rs. 2,50,000/- as compensation on account of his death. The Tribunal

returned a finding that Sukhdev Singh died due to the rash and negligent driving by Jaswant Singh, respondent No. 1. The Tribunal awarded Rs.

1,15,200/-by applying a multiplier of 16. It also held that the deceased was getting Rs. 1,004.70 p.m. as his salary out of which he must have been

spending 1/3rd on himself and Rs. 600/- p.m. on the maintenance of his dependants. Not even a suggestion was put to Jasbir Kaur, PW 4, in her

cross-examination that her deceased husband was not spending such an amount on the maintenance of his family members. In the absence of

evidence to the contrary, I am of the view that the deceased must have been spending Rs. 800/- p.m. on the maintenance of his dependants and as

such, applying the multiplier of 16, the compensation comes to about Rs. 1,53,600/- to which the claimants are entitled in all.

2. The claimants shall also be entitled to 12 per cent interest from the date of filing of the application. The appeal is allowed with costs in the above

terms. Counsel''s fee is assessed at Rs. 500/-.

From The Blog
Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Read More
Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Read More