In Re: Amit Kumar Deb @ Amit Deb

Calcutta High Court 2 Nov 2012 C.R.M. 17072 of 2012 (2012) 11 CAL CK 0006
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

C.R.M. 17072 of 2012

Hon'ble Bench

Joymalya Bagchi, J

Advocates

Asis Sanyal, Mr. A.K. Chakraborty and Mr. Sajal Kanti Bhattacharyya, for the Appellant; Kutubuddin for the State, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Joymalya Bagchi, J.@mdashHeard the learned Counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. Perused the Case papers. The petitioner prays for bail on the ground that he is in custody for about 29 days and that the dispute is essentially a civil one.

2. Having considered the materials in the Case Dairy and bearing in mind the period of detention of the petitioner, I am of the opinion that further detention is not necessary in the facts of the present case.

3. The petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gangarampur, Buniadpur. Accordingly, the prayer for bail stands allowed.

From The Blog
J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Dec
08
2025

Court News

J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Read More
ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Dec
08
2025

Court News

ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Read More