Jasbir Singh, J.@mdashThis application has been moved for condonation of delay of 148 days in filing this appeal. Application is accompanied by an affidavit. Despite many efforts made, service of the respondents is not complete. In view of averments made in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, it is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
F.A. No. 299 of 2005:
2. Vide order under challenge, Commissioner under the Workmen''s Compensation Act, 1923, has granted compensation to the tune of Rs. 2,80,350 along with interest to the widow and minor children, i.e., the respondents on account of death of Shri Ram Singh. It is apparent from the records that the appellant along with other respondents has failed to lead any evidence to rebut the claim of the respondents. Age of the deceased was only 39 years. He was getting salary of Rs. 3,000 per month. In view of this, compensation awarded is perfectly justified. Counsel for the appellant has contended that the appellant has wrongly been burdened with liability to pay interest on the compensation awarded. However, he has failed to show that there was any negative clause with regard to the payment of interest in the policy. In view of judgment of the Hon''ble Supreme Court in
