Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.@mdashThis petition seeks quashing of order dated 2.11.2004, Annexure P-7.
2. By the said order, the Sales Tax Tribunal, Punjab dismissed the appeals of the petitioner against orders of assessment and levy of penalty under
the provisions of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948. The petitioner also filed an application for rectification of the said order which was
dismissed on 8.11.2005. To explain delay and not availing of remedy of reference available under the Statute, contention raised on behalf of the
petitioner is that the petitioner had instructed his Counsel to file application for reference but the Counsel failed to do so.
3. It is patent that the petitioner moved this Court six years after passing of the impugned order and five years after dismissal of the application for
rectification. The petition, thus, suffers from laches and cannot be entertained, at this stage.
4. It is well settled that for invoking jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner should come to the Court at the earliest
reasonable opportunity. Reference may be made to judgment of Constitution Bench of the Hon''ble Supreme Court in Tilokchand and Motichand
and Others Vs. H.B. Munshi and Another, , paras 10, 41 and 65. The principles laid down therein have been reiterated, inter-alia, in Eastern
Coalfields Limited v. Dugal Kumar (2008) 14 SCC 295, paras 24 to 29.
5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
