Sukhwinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab and others

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 14 Dec 2010 C.W.P. No. 19787 of 2010
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

C.W.P. No. 19787 of 2010

Hon'ble Bench

Alok Singh, J

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred

General Clauses Act, 1897 — Section 9#Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 — Section 19(2)

Judgement Text

Translate:

Alok Singh, J.@mdashReply on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4 filed In Court today is taken on record.

2. Undisputedly, notice u/s 19(2) of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act to convene a meeting to discuss and take decision on the no confidence motion

was issued on 10.9.2010.

3. As per the respondents, notice was served on the petitioner on 11.9.2010 by affixation.

4. Undisputedly, meeting was held on 17.9.2010 to discuss and take decision on the no confidence motion.

5. As per the dictum of the Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Mohinder Singh v. State of Punjab and others, 2006 (1) PLR 290 seven

days'' clear notice is required to be given u/s 19(2) of the Act and first day and the last day of the notice must be excluded to calculate seven days''

clear period in view of Section 9 of the General Clauses Act.

6. In CWP No. 18361 of 2010 titled Sukhchain Singh v. State of Punjab and others"", decided on 13.12.2010, this Court has held as under :

In the opinion of this Court, 7 days clear period should be counted not from the date of notice but from the date notice is served on the

members/panches after excluding the date of service of notice. After the date of service of notice, there should be 7 days clear period in between

the service of notice and the day of convening the meeting.

7. In view of the above, present petition is allowed. Impugned resolution is quashed. However, liberty is granted to the respondents to convene

fresh meeting, if they so desire, in accordance with law.