Sunil Dutt Vs State of Haryana

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 26 Feb 2010 Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-2114 of 2010 (2010) 02 P&H CK 0328
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-2114 of 2010

Hon'ble Bench

Ajai Lamba, J

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Arms Act, 1959 - Section 25
  • Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Section 439
  • Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 394, 397, 411

Judgement Text

Translate:

Ajai Lamba, J.@mdashThis petition has been filed u/s 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 3 dated 4.1.2009 under Sections 394, 397, 411 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, registered with Police Station, Sadar, Sonipat.

2. Learned Counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from Jai Parkash, Assistant Sub Inspector, at the very outset has pointed out that the petitioner is involved in two earlier cases of similar nature. So far as the present case is concerned, the vehicle was snatched. The driver was assaulted. The money available was also taken away. So far as the legal evidence so as to connect the petitioner is concerned, recoveries have been effected which connect the petitioner with the offence.

3. In view of the antecedents and nature of offence committed by the petitioner, no ground to allow bail to the petitioner is made out.

4. The petition is dismissed.

5. However, in view of the custody of the petitioner, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Clarifies: ‘No Coercive Measures’ Protects Only Against Arrest, Not Investigation Stay
Nov
06
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Clarifies: ‘No Coercive Measures’ Protects Only Against Arrest, Not Investigation Stay
Read More
Supreme Court Orders Compensatory Plantation on 185 Acres in Delhi Ridge by March 2026
Nov
06
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Orders Compensatory Plantation on 185 Acres in Delhi Ridge by March 2026
Read More