The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Malwa Cotton Spinning Mills

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 18 Mar 2011 R.A.-CR No. 210-CII of 2010 in ITA No. 392 of 2010
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

R.A.-CR No. 210-CII of 2010 in ITA No. 392 of 2010

Hon'ble Bench

M.M. Kumar, J; Jitendra Chauhan, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

M.M. Kumar, J.@mdashThis is an application seeking review of our order dated 12.05.2010 in respect of question Nos. i, ii, v. and iv.

2. Notice of the application has been issued.

3. Mr. Sandeep Goyal, learned Counsel for the non applicant-Respondent has put in appearance on behalf of the Respondent. The prayer made in

the application has been opposed by filing reply to the review application.

4. After hearing learned Counsel for the parties, we are of the view that there are sufficient grounds for accepting the review application in respect

of question Nos. i, ii, v. and iv.

5. Mr. Dinesh Goyal, learned Counsel for the review applicant has pointed out various objections made in the order of Tribunal, which shows to

the contrary. Those paras have also been cited in the review application. There is no serious dispute with regard to the aforesaid factual position.

6. In view of the above, we recall our order dated 12.05.2010 in respect of question Nos. i, ii, v. and iv 22.04.2010. Let the matter be listed for

motion hearing as per roster.

From The Blog
Samsher Singh Vs State of Punjab (1974)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

Samsher Singh Vs State of Punjab (1974)
Read More
Direct Recruit Engineering vs State of Maharashtra
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

Direct Recruit Engineering vs State of Maharashtra
Read More