The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Malwa Cotton Spinning Mills

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 18 Mar 2011 R.A.-CR No. 210-CII of 2010 in ITA No. 392 of 2010 (2011) 03 P&H CK 0783
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

R.A.-CR No. 210-CII of 2010 in ITA No. 392 of 2010

Hon'ble Bench

M.M. Kumar, J; Jitendra Chauhan, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

M.M. Kumar, J.@mdashThis is an application seeking review of our order dated 12.05.2010 in respect of question Nos. i, ii, v. and iv.

2. Notice of the application has been issued.

3. Mr. Sandeep Goyal, learned Counsel for the non applicant-Respondent has put in appearance on behalf of the Respondent. The prayer made in the application has been opposed by filing reply to the review application.

4. After hearing learned Counsel for the parties, we are of the view that there are sufficient grounds for accepting the review application in respect of question Nos. i, ii, v. and iv.

5. Mr. Dinesh Goyal, learned Counsel for the review applicant has pointed out various objections made in the order of Tribunal, which shows to the contrary. Those paras have also been cited in the review application. There is no serious dispute with regard to the aforesaid factual position.

6. In view of the above, we recall our order dated 12.05.2010 in respect of question Nos. i, ii, v. and iv 22.04.2010. Let the matter be listed for motion hearing as per roster.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Questions Multiplex Food Prices: “₹100 for Water, ₹700 for Coffee”
Nov
05
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Questions Multiplex Food Prices: “₹100 for Water, ₹700 for Coffee”
Read More
Delhi High Court Upholds Landlord Heirs’ Rights, Orders Eviction of Sub-Tenants in Ownership Dispute
Nov
05
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Upholds Landlord Heirs’ Rights, Orders Eviction of Sub-Tenants in Ownership Dispute
Read More