Mohinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab and others

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 17 Aug 2012 Civil Writ Petition No. 19472 of 2011 (2012) 08 P&H CK 0311
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Civil Writ Petition No. 19472 of 2011

Hon'ble Bench

Jasbir Singh, Acting C.J.; Rakesh Kumar Jain, J

Advocates

B.P.S. Virk, for the Appellant; J.S. Puri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent Nos. 1 to 4, Mr. Ranjit S. Dhiman, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 5 and 14, Mr. Rakesh Chopra, Advocate, for respondent No. 6, Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 7 to 10 and Mr. Suresh Singla, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 11 to 13, for the Respondent

Judgement Text

Translate:

Jasbir Singh, ACJ

1. By filing this petition, the petitioner has prayed that proceedings be initiated against respondent Nos.6 to 10 for ejecting them from Gram Panchayat land falling in Khasra Nos.57, 52, 63 and 75 which is meant for Kabristan of village Burar. It is stated that the above respondents, in connivance with members of the Panchayat, are in unauthorised occupation of the public land.

2. In response to notice issued, reply was filed wherein it is stated that demarcation was got done by Assistant Collector on 9.2.2012 and ejectment applications have been filed against those who have been found in unauthorised occupation of the Panchayat land before the competent Court. In one case, even the ejectment order has also been passed.

3. Since the authorities have initiated action for retrieving the land from illegal possession of encroachers, this writ petition has become infructuous and is disposed of as such.

4. However, District Development and Panchayat Officer, Patiala is directed to ensure that the applications are contested by the Gram Panchayat(s) properly by leading evidence as per law. It is expected that Collector, before whom the proceedings are pending, shall make an endeavour to conclude the proceedings within six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Clarifies: Legislature Cannot Override Court Judgments, But Can Fix Legal Defects Through Amendments
Nov
09
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Clarifies: Legislature Cannot Override Court Judgments, But Can Fix Legal Defects Through Amendments
Read More
Delhi High Court Rules: Profits from Inflated Shares Are Proceeds of Crime Under PMLA
Nov
09
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Rules: Profits from Inflated Shares Are Proceeds of Crime Under PMLA
Read More