Gurjit Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Another

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 26 Apr 2011 Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-12265 of 2011 (O and M) (2011) 04 P&H CK 0308
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-12265 of 2011 (O and M)

Hon'ble Bench

Alok Singh, J

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 304B, 34

Judgement Text

Translate:

Alok Singh, J.@mdashPetitioners - husband, father-in-law and mother-in-law are seeking anticipatory bail by way of present petition.

2. Record reveals that Petitioners are summoned to face trial vide order dated 05.03.2011 passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sardulgarh, for offences punishable under Sections 304-B/34 IPC. Record further reveals that Amandip Kaur daughter of complainant-Amarjit Singh was married with Petitioner No. 1 Gurjit Singh on 11.10.2006 and she has expired within seven years of her marriage. Poisonous substance was found in her stomach. There are serious allegations against the Petitioners. Since learned Magistrate has applied his mind to summon the accused Petitioners to face trial for offences punishable under Sections 304-B/34 IPC, therefore, at this stage it cannot be said that no prima facie case is made out against the Petitioners, rather from the summoning order, prima facie case is made out against the Petitioner for offences punishable under Sections 304-B/34 IPC. No good ground is made out to grant anticipatory bail.

Dismissed.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Read More
Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Read More