Satish Kumar Mittal, J.@mdashThe defendant, who is the landlord of the plaintiff, has filed the instant revision petition for setting aside the order
dated 24.05.2013 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned District Judge, Ferozepur, whereby after setting the order of the trial Court, the prayer of
the respondent-tenant for interim injunction was allowed and the Electricity Department was directed to restore the electricity connection on
payment of all the charges by the plaintiff. In this case, it has been found by the Appellate Court that there is history of litigation between the tenant
and the landlord over the demised premises of which the landlord wanted to take forcible and illegal possession. The electricity connection
provided by the Electricity Department to the demised premises was disconnected on the ground of non payment of electricity charges amounting
to Rs. 4,772/-. The plaintiff, prime facie, had shown to the Appellate Court that the said amount was paid by him on the same day. Keeping in
view all these facts and finding a prima facie case and further the balance of convenience in favour of the plaintiff, the Appellate Court after setting
aside the order of the trial Court, which had gone on technicalities, has directed the Electricity Department to restore the electricity connection on
payment of all me dues. The interim order has been basically passed against the Electricity Department, which is not in revision. As far as the
landlord is concerned, he has no interest in restoration of the electricity supply to the demised premises, the payment of which is to be made by the
tenant as the electricity connection installed in the premises is meant for the tenant But in spite of that, the landlord has filed the instant revision
petition for setting aside the aforesaid interim order which has been passed against the Electricity Department and not against the landlord. In my
opinion, in view of Section 10 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, the tenant cannot be denied the basic amenity of electricity,
and the Appellate Court has rightly directed the Electricity Department to restore the electricity connection on payment of all the charges by the
plaintiff-tenant. In these facts, I do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned order passed by the Appellate Court, in exercise of the
superintending powers of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
Dismissed.