Nirmal Singh Vs Gurdwara Sangatpura

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 26 May 2011 C.R. No. 1094 of 2011 (O and M) (2011) 05 P&H CK 0278
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

C.R. No. 1094 of 2011 (O and M)

Hon'ble Bench

Rakesh Kumar Jain, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.@mdashThis revision petition has been filed against the order dated 17.01.2011 (Annexure P-5) vide which the application filed by the tenant to amend the written statement has been declined on the ground that it is to delay the proceedings.

2. Counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that in the absence of pleadings, he would not be able to lead evidence and precisely on that ground he sought the amendment.

3. At this stage, counsel for the Respondent has submitted that they would not raise any objection before Rent Controller in case the tenant leads evidence, for which the permission has already been granted by the learned Rent Controller, despite the fact that they have not pleaded the said fact.

4. This concession made by learned Counsel for the Respondent satisfies the counsel for the Petitioner.

5. In view thereof, this revision petition is accordingly disposed of.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Upholds Stay on ICC Arbitration in Oman-India Border Security Dispute, Dismisses MSA Global’s Appeal
Dec
27
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Upholds Stay on ICC Arbitration in Oman-India Border Security Dispute, Dismisses MSA Global’s Appeal
Read More
Bombay High Court: Profit from Margin Glitch Not Unjust Enrichment in Kotak Securities Case
Dec
27
2025

Court News

Bombay High Court: Profit from Margin Glitch Not Unjust Enrichment in Kotak Securities Case
Read More