Harjinder Singh @ Billu Vs State of Punjab

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 13 Sep 2010 Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-8156 of 2010
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-8156 of 2010

Hon'ble Bench

Ajai Lamba, J

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 313, 439#Explosives Act, 1884 — Section 3, 4, 5#Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 120B, 121, 121A, 123, 13#Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — Section 10, 11, 13

Judgement Text

Translate:

Ajai Lamba, J.@mdashThis petition has been filed u/s 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 84 dated 29.6.2009 under Sections

121, 121-A, 123, 13, 13-A, 120-B IPC; Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Explosives Act; Sections 10, 11, 13 of Unlawful Activities Act, 1967, registered

with Police Station, Raikot.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that entire evidence has been recorded by the Trial Court. Not a single witness has given statement

against the petitioner to show that the petitioner has committed the offence as alleged.

3. Learned Counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from Balkar Singh, Assistant Sub Inspector, contends that all the witnesses had to be

declared hostile. There is no evidence forthcoming against the petitioner. The case is now fixed for the statement of the accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C.

Learned Counsel further states that no recovery has been effected from the petitioner.

4. Considering the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, the petition is allowed.

5. Bail to the satisfaction of Trial Court. Heavy surety.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: 8-Year Service Termination Cannot Be Justified
Oct
23
2025

Story

Supreme Court: 8-Year Service Termination Cannot Be Justified
Read More
Supreme Court Asks Centre to Respond on Online Gambling Ban
Oct
23
2025

Story

Supreme Court Asks Centre to Respond on Online Gambling Ban
Read More