Shivangini and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 13 Sep 2010 Criminal M. No. M-26810 of 2010 (O and M) (2010) 09 P&H CK 0330
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal M. No. M-26810 of 2010 (O and M)

Hon'ble Bench

K.C. Puri, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

K.C. Puri, J.@mdashThe case of the petitioners is that they are major and have contracted marriage on 30.8.2010. The marriage certificate and the photographs evidencing marriage have been placed on the file. It is alleged that they apprehend danger from respondents No. 5 and 6. To seek redressal of their grievance, they have submitted representation dated 7.9.2010, (Annexure P-5) to the S.S.P., Mohali.

2. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Punjab.

3. On the asking of the Court, Sh. Sudhir Nehra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice.

4. Without commenting on the age of the petitioners and validity of the marriage, directions are given to S.S.P., Mohali to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-5) within one month from today, keeping in view the threat perception to the petitioners.

5. However, it is made clear that in case any criminal case is pending against the petitioners, this order shall not debar the respondents to proceed with.

6. The petition stands disposed of.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Allows Landlady to Evict Tenant for Husband’s Dry Fruit Business, Affirms Bona Fide Requirement Under Rent Control Act
Nov
20
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Allows Landlady to Evict Tenant for Husband’s Dry Fruit Business, Affirms Bona Fide Requirement Under Rent Control Act
Read More
Delhi High Court Issues Permanent Injunction in Anjana Om Kashyap Deepfake Case, Strengthens Protection Against Digital Impersonation
Nov
20
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Issues Permanent Injunction in Anjana Om Kashyap Deepfake Case, Strengthens Protection Against Digital Impersonation
Read More