Harisha Kumar Kalra and Others Vs Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board and Another

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 14 Sep 2012 C.W.P. No. 8109 of 2010 (2012) 09 P&H CK 0345
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

C.W.P. No. 8109 of 2010

Hon'ble Bench

Rajiv Narain Raina, J; Hemant Gupta, J

Advocates

Mahavir Sandhu, for the Appellant; Namit Kumar, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Hemant Gupta, J.@mdashThe petitioners were successful allottees of booths at New Grain Market, Shehzadpur in the year 2008. The petitioners have claimed a writ of mandamus for directing the respondents to provide all the basic amenities and facilities like electricity, roads, sewerage, water shed, trash dumping ground etc. In the written statement filed, it has been stated that the basic facilities have been provided to the petitioners.

2. In view of the said assertion and for the detailed reasons recorded in LPA No. 502 of 2011 titled "Raksha Rani Vs. Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board & others", we do not find any merit in the present petition. The same is accordingly dismissed.

From The Blog
Foreign Shares Not Reported in Schedule FA: Legal Consequences, Scenarios, and What Taxpayers Must Do
Jan
08
2026

Court News

Foreign Shares Not Reported in Schedule FA: Legal Consequences, Scenarios, and What Taxpayers Must Do
Read More
CCI Cracks Down on Collusive Bidding in Defence Tender: Why Fair Competition Protects Price Discovery
Jan
08
2026

Court News

CCI Cracks Down on Collusive Bidding in Defence Tender: Why Fair Competition Protects Price Discovery
Read More