Smt. Sarita Gupta and another Vs State of Haryana and another

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 23 Jan 2009 CRM No. 27058 M of 2008 (O and M) (2009) 5 RCR(Criminal) 786
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CRM No. 27058 M of 2008 (O and M)

Hon'ble Bench

Harbans Lal, J

Advocates

Dheeraj Narula, for Sandeep Punchhi, for the Appellant; A.K. Jindal, AAG, Haryana, For the Respondent No. 2-Complainant Mr. S.K. Biriwal, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482#Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 417

Judgement Text

Translate:

Harbans Lal, J.@mdashThis petition has been moved by Sarita Gupta and another u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing

FIR No. 447 dated 22.9.2000, (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 417, 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code at

Police Station City Sirsa and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the ground of compromise (Annexure P- 2).

2. The grounds pleaded are that the parties have compromised the matter with the intervention of the respectables, therefore, no useful purpose

would be served if the proceedings are allowed to continue. Complainant has sworn an affidavit (Annexure P-2) wherein he has stated that he has

received full and final payment from the petitioners and matter has been compromised, therefore, he has no objection if the FIR in question is

quashed.

3. Mr. S.K. Biriwal, Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No. 2- complainant has also conceded this fact.

4. In view of the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in re : Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR

1052., the Court is competent to quash the proceedings on the basis of compromise. Sequelly, this petition is accepted and FIR No. 447 dated

22.9.2000, (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 417, 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station City Sirsa

and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

From The Blog
M.C. Mehta vs Union of India
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

M.C. Mehta vs Union of India
Read More
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi & Others vs State of U.P. & Others (1990)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi & Others vs State of U.P. & Others (1990)
Read More