Vinod Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 19 Sep 2012 CWP No. 10816 of 2011 (2012) 09 P&H CK 0371
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CWP No. 10816 of 2011

Hon'ble Bench

Augustine George Masih, J

Advocates

S.K. Redhu, for the Appellant; Harish Rathee, D.A.G. Haryana, for the Respondent

Judgement Text

Translate:

Augustine George Masih, J.@mdashCounsel for the petitioner states that the present writ petition has been rendered in fructuous. Ordered accordingly.

Uttarakhand High Court
Roshni Bisht And Another Vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others
16 Jan 2026
Supreme Court Of India
Tulasareddi @ Mudakappa & Anr Vs State Of Karnataka & Ors
16 Jan 2026
From The Blog
High Court Rules: Taxpayers Can Correct Bona Fide Errors in GST Returns Without Penalty
Jan
20
2026

Court News

High Court Rules: Taxpayers Can Correct Bona Fide Errors in GST Returns Without Penalty
Read More
Supreme Court Rules: No Writ Petition Against Its Own Judgments, Imposes ₹1 Lakh Cost
Jan
20
2026

Court News

Supreme Court Rules: No Writ Petition Against Its Own Judgments, Imposes ₹1 Lakh Cost
Read More
Quick Actions
Download PDF Open PDF in New Tab
Case Metadata
  • Ck Citation: (2012) 09 P&H CK 0371
  • Coram: Augustine George Masih, J
  • Bench: Single Bench
  • Advocates: S.K. Redhu, for the Appellant; Harish Rathee, D.A.G. Haryana, for the Respondent
Stay Updated

Subscribe for weekly highlights on judgements, legal insights, and workflow tips.