Vinod Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 19 Sep 2012 CWP No. 10816 of 2011 (2012) 09 P&H CK 0371
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CWP No. 10816 of 2011

Hon'ble Bench

Augustine George Masih, J

Advocates

S.K. Redhu, for the Appellant; Harish Rathee, D.A.G. Haryana, for the Respondent

Judgement Text

Translate:

Augustine George Masih, J.@mdashCounsel for the petitioner states that the present writ petition has been rendered in fructuous. Ordered accordingly.

Madras HC
Chandrasekar Vs Latchmi
25 Nov 2025
Meghalaya HC
Mamota G. Sangma & 2 Ors Vs Kukila Marak
25 Nov 2025
From The Blog
Allahabad High Court Quashes Lucknow Residency Rule for E-Rickshaw Registration, Calls It Arbitrary and Unconstitutional
Dec
02
2025

Court News

Allahabad High Court Quashes Lucknow Residency Rule for E-Rickshaw Registration, Calls It Arbitrary and Unconstitutional
Read More
NRI Property Buying in India: Legal Rules, Tax Challenges, and Sale Issues Explained
Dec
02
2025

Court News

NRI Property Buying in India: Legal Rules, Tax Challenges, and Sale Issues Explained
Read More
Quick Actions
Download PDF Open PDF in New Tab
Case Metadata
  • Ck Citation: (2012) 09 P&H CK 0371
  • Coram: Augustine George Masih, J
  • Bench: Single Bench
  • Advocates: S.K. Redhu, for the Appellant; Harish Rathee, D.A.G. Haryana, for the Respondent
Stay Updated

Subscribe for weekly highlights on judgements, legal insights, and workflow tips.