Vinod Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 19 Sep 2012 CWP No. 10816 of 2011 (2012) 09 P&H CK 0371
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CWP No. 10816 of 2011

Hon'ble Bench

Augustine George Masih, J

Advocates

S.K. Redhu, for the Appellant; Harish Rathee, D.A.G. Haryana, for the Respondent

Judgement Text

Translate:

Augustine George Masih, J.@mdashCounsel for the petitioner states that the present writ petition has been rendered in fructuous. Ordered accordingly.

Uttarakhand HC
Vikram Singh Chaudhary Vs State Of Uttarakhand And Another
29 Dec 2025
Uttarakhand HC
Dharmendra Kumar Agarwal Vs State Of Uttarakhand
29 Dec 2025
From The Blog
CBSE Suspends Gurugram School’s Affiliation; Spotlight on Rules That Protect Students Nationwide
Jan
01
2026

Court News

CBSE Suspends Gurugram School’s Affiliation; Spotlight on Rules That Protect Students Nationwide
Read More
Delhi High Court Rules: Voice Samples for Call Matching Do Not Violate Fundamental Rights
Jan
01
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Rules: Voice Samples for Call Matching Do Not Violate Fundamental Rights
Read More
Quick Actions
Download PDF Open PDF in New Tab
Case Metadata
  • Ck Citation: (2012) 09 P&H CK 0371
  • Coram: Augustine George Masih, J
  • Bench: Single Bench
  • Advocates: S.K. Redhu, for the Appellant; Harish Rathee, D.A.G. Haryana, for the Respondent
Stay Updated

Subscribe for weekly highlights on judgements, legal insights, and workflow tips.