Kapil Vs State of Haryana

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 13 Jul 2006 Criminal M. No. 33372 of 2006 in Criminal A. No. 696-SB of 2006 (2006) 3 RCR(Criminal) 799
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal M. No. 33372 of 2006 in Criminal A. No. 696-SB of 2006

Hon'ble Bench

Ajai Lamba, J

Advocates

S.S. Khurana, for the Appellant; S.K. Hooda, D.A.G., Haryana, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

Ajai Lamba, J.@mdashThe allegations against the applicant-appellant are that he committed rape upon the prosecutrix. However, learned counsel

for the applicant has referred to the fact that the prosecutrix, admittedly, was first taken to Mohindergarh, then to Jaipur, Narnaul and back to

Mohindergarh in public transport. Further contends that despite the fact that the prosecutrix remained with the applicant for 4 days, no resistance

was shown, which establishes consent. The question of age of the prosecutrix would be a matter of evidence as it is stated to be 16-1/2 years.

Further states that the appeal would not be heard in the near future.

2. Sentence of the applicant-appellant is hereby suspended.

3. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM, Narnaul.

Appeal allowed.

From The Blog
SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Read More
SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Read More