Kapil Vs State of Haryana

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 13 Jul 2006 Criminal M. No. 33372 of 2006 in Criminal A. No. 696-SB of 2006 (2006) 07 P&H CK 0217
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal M. No. 33372 of 2006 in Criminal A. No. 696-SB of 2006

Hon'ble Bench

Ajai Lamba, J

Advocates

S.S. Khurana, for the Appellant; S.K. Hooda, D.A.G., Haryana, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

Ajai Lamba, J.@mdashThe allegations against the applicant-appellant are that he committed rape upon the prosecutrix. However, learned counsel for the applicant has referred to the fact that the prosecutrix, admittedly, was first taken to Mohindergarh, then to Jaipur, Narnaul and back to Mohindergarh in public transport. Further contends that despite the fact that the prosecutrix remained with the applicant for 4 days, no resistance was shown, which establishes consent. The question of age of the prosecutrix would be a matter of evidence as it is stated to be 16-1/2 years. Further states that the appeal would not be heard in the near future.

2. Sentence of the applicant-appellant is hereby suspended.

3. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM, Narnaul.

Appeal allowed.

From The Blog
CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Dec
16
2025

Court News

CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Read More
Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Dec
16
2025

Court News

Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Read More