Tehal Singh Vs State of Punjab

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 16 Feb 2006 Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3239-M of 2006
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3239-M of 2006

Hon'ble Bench

A.K. Goel, J

Advocates

Madan Sandhu, for the Appellant; Reeta Kohli, DAG, Punjab, for the Respondent

Acts Referred

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS) — Section 18

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.@mdashHeard.

2. Offence alleged is u/s 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

3. The petitioner is said to be in custody for the last about ten months. Alleged recovery is of two kilograms of opium.

4. Counsel for the State says that the case is fixed for evidence on 8.3.2006 and the evidence is likely to be over within four months from the said

date.

5. Without expressing any final opinion on merits and while declining bail at this stage, a direction is issued that if prosecution evidence is not

concluded within four months form the date fixed, for reasons not attributable to the petitioner, he will be granted bail by the trial Court subject to

such conditions as may be considered to be appropriate.

6. The petition is disposed of.

Petition disposed of.

From The Blog
Moti Ram Deka & Ors vs General Manager, N.E.F. Railways & Ors (1963)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

Moti Ram Deka & Ors vs General Manager, N.E.F. Railways & Ors (1963)
Read More
M/s. Orissa Cement Ltd. & Others vs State of Orissa & Others (1991)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

M/s. Orissa Cement Ltd. & Others vs State of Orissa & Others (1991)
Read More