Malkeet Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Another

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 8 Nov 2012 CRM M-30535 of 2012 (O and M) (2012) 11 P&H CK 0134
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CRM M-30535 of 2012 (O and M)

Hon'ble Bench

Paramjeet Singh, J

Advocates

R.K. Girdhar, for the Appellant; Gurinderjit Singh, DAG, Punjab and Mr. Pankaj Sothra, Advocate, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Section 482
  • Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 116, 306

Judgement Text

Translate:

Paramjeet Singh, J.@mdashPresent petition has been filed by Malkeet Singh and others u/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 18 dated 27.02.2012, under Sections 306/116 IPC, registered at Police Station City Malout, District Sri Muktsar Sahib, and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 17.09.2012 (Annexure P/2). Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the alleged person is alive, still case for offence u/s 306 IPC has been registered. Learned counsel for the petitioners has relied upon a judgment of this Court in the matter of Bhupinder Kaur vs. State of Punjab and another, 2004 (2) RCR (Cri.) 443 to contend that there is no reasonable likelihood of the accused being convicted for the offence for the reason that the complainant has compromised the matter with the accused and he is not likely to support the prosecution and from other facts and circumstances available on the record, therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to decline the prayer for quashing of the FIR on the ground that it would amount to be permitting the parties to compound non-compoundable offence.

2. On the last date of hearing i.e. 05.11.2012, respondent No. 2 has filed his affidavit and stated therein that he does not want to proceed with the case registered against the accused and if the aforesaid FIR is quashed, then he has no objection in this regard.

3. In compliance with order dated 05.11.2012, SI Mohan Lal, who is present in court today, has filed his affidavit in Court today and tenders an unconditional apology for his lapse in registering the case u/s 306 IPC when the person is alive. The aforesaid affidavit is taken on record. SI Mohan Singh assures that no such lapse will be repeated in future.

4. Consequently, in view of compromise (Annexure P/2) and keeping in view the law laid down by the Hon''ble Apex Court in the case of Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab, 2008 (2) RCR (Cri.) 429, which has been affirmed by a Larger Bench of the Hon''ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another, SLP (Crl.) No. 8989 of 2010, decided on 24.09.2012, by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, and judgment of this Court in Bhupinder Kaur''s case (supra) no useful purpose would be served in prolonging the litigation, especially when this case does not fall within the category of exceptional cases where this Court should not exercise its inherent jurisdictional powers to quash the criminal proceedings, as held in Gian Singh''s case (supra). In the facts and circumstances of this case, it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the criminal proceedings or continuation of the criminal proceedings would amount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and wrongdoer and to secure the ends of justice, therefore, it is appropriate that criminal case is put to an end. Present petition is allowed. FIR No. 18 dated 27.02.2012, under Sections 306/116 IPC, registered at Police Station City Malout, District Sri Muktsar Sahib, is hereby quashed and all the criminal proceedings arising out of the said FIR also stand quashed.

From The Blog
Quick Checklist: Start a Company in the USA from India
Nov
09
2025

Court News

Quick Checklist: Start a Company in the USA from India
Read More
Supreme Court: Release Deed Ends Coparcener Rights in Joint Family Property; Unregistered Settlements Valid to Show Severance
Nov
09
2025

Court News

Supreme Court: Release Deed Ends Coparcener Rights in Joint Family Property; Unregistered Settlements Valid to Show Severance
Read More