Harbhajan Ram Vs Tarsem Lal

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 28 Oct 2010 C.R. No. 1793 of 2010 (O and M)
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

C.R. No. 1793 of 2010 (O and M)

Hon'ble Bench

Alok Singh, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

Alok Singh, J.@mdashVakalatnama filed on behalf of the Respondent is taken on record.

2. Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 26.11.2007 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Garhshankar as well as

order dated 23.01.2010 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur, whereby allowing the application seeking ad-interim mandatory

injunction moved by the Defendant-Respondent and dismissing the ad-interim injunction application moved by the Plaintiff-Petitioner herein.

3. Learned Counsel appearing for the parties fairly stated that present petition be disposed of with their consent in the following terms:

i) Parties shall maintain status-quo qua the possession and nature of the property till the disposal of the suit.

ii) The learned trial Court shall decide the suit itself preferably within six months from the date certified copy of this order is placed before the

learned trial Court.

iii) None of the parties shall seek any unnecessary adjournment.

iv) Any observation made in the impugned order shall not prejudice mind of the learned trial Court while deciding the suit at its own merit in

accordance with law.

4. Present petition stands disposed of with the consent of learned Counsel for the parties in the above terms.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: 8-Year Service Termination Cannot Be Justified
Oct
23
2025

Story

Supreme Court: 8-Year Service Termination Cannot Be Justified
Read More
Supreme Court Asks Centre to Respond on Online Gambling Ban
Oct
23
2025

Story

Supreme Court Asks Centre to Respond on Online Gambling Ban
Read More