Nirmaljit Kaur, J.@mdashThis is a petition u/s 482 Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of the FIR No. 251 dated 24.12.2009 under
Sections 363 and 366 IPC registered at Police Station Phase-8, District Mohali and subsequent proceedings arising out of the above said FIR on
the basis of compromise entered into between the parties.
2. The FIR was registered against the present Petitioners by Respondent No. 2-Nankoo son of Ram Bharose due to misunderstanding. Now
matter has been compromised. As per the compromise, the complainant Respondents No. 2 and 3 do not wish to pursue the above mentioned
FIR against the Petitioners. Affidavits were also executed affirming the factum of compromise and the same are placed on record as P-1 and P-2.
Respondents No. 2 and 3 are present in the Court in person. Separate statements of Respondents No. 2 and 3 have also been recorded. It is duly
stated by them that the matter has been compromised and they have no objection, if the said FIR is quashed.
3. The Full Bench of this Court, in the case of Kulwinder Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr. 2007(3) RCR 1052 has held that the
compromise, in a modern society, is the sine qua non of harmony and orderly behaviour. It is the soul of justice and if the power u/s 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure is used to enhance such a compromise which, in turn, enhances the social amity and reduces friction, then it truly is
finest hour of justice"". Disputes which have their genesis not only in matrimonial discord but others as well, such compromise deserves to be
accepted. It is further held as under:
The only inevitable conclusion from the above discussion is that there is no statutory bar under the Code of Criminal Procedure which can affect
the inherent power of this Court u/s 482. Further, the same cannot be limited to matrimonial cases alone and the Court has the wide power to
quash the proceedings even in non-compoundable offences notwithstanding the bar u/s 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in order to prevent
the abuse of law and to secure the ends of justice.
4. In the case of Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab, , the Apex Court emphasised and advised as under:
We need to emphasise that it is perhaps advisable that in disputes where the question involved is of a purely personal nature, the court should
ordinarily accept the terms of the compromise even in criminal proceedings as keeping the matter alive with no possibility of a result in favour of the
prosecution is a luxury which the courts, grossly overburdened as they are, cannot afford and that the time so saved can be utilised in deciding
more effective and meaningful litigation. This is a common sense approach to the matter based on ground of realities and bereft of the technicalities
of the law.
5. In the present case, the dispute is of kidnapping the daughter of Respondents No. 2 and 3. The same has been compromised. Sometimes, these
cases are of consent. FIR is registered by the parents without knowing the said fact. No doubt, it is stated that the FIR was registered on a
misunderstanding. In view of the settled position of law, it would be just and proper to quash the FIR for peace, harmony and thus allow the
parties to move on in life.
6. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No. 251 dated 24.12.2009 under Sections 363 and 366 IPC registered at Police Station
Phase-8, District Mohali and subsequent proceedings arising out of the above said FIR are hereby quashed in the interest of justice.