Isab and Another Vs State of Haryana

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 2 Dec 2010 Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-29733 of 2010
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-29733 of 2010

Hon'ble Bench

Daya Chaudhary, J

Acts Referred

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438, 438(2)#Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 147, 148, 149, 186, 188#Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 — Section 3

Judgement Text

Translate:

Daya Chaudhary, J.@mdashThe present petition u/s 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail has been filed on behalf of the

Petitioners in case FIR No. 132 dated 6.6.2010 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 186, 188 IPC, Section 135, 135A of R.P. Act

and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act at Police Station Nagina, District Mewat.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners contends that in compliance of order dated 7.10.2010, the Petitioners have joined the investigation and

recovery has also been effected from them.

3. Learned Counsel for the Respondent-State on instructions from Kuldeep Singh, ASI opposes the bail on the ground that the Petitioners have

given beatings to the officials, who were on election duty. However, learned Counsel has not controverted the factum of joining the investigation by

the Petitioners and also contends that recovery has also been effected from them.

4. I have heard the arguments advanced by learned Counsel for the parties and have also gone through the contents of the FIR.

5. As per allegations in the FIR, Petitioners gave beatings with dandas and lathies but there is nothing on record to show that any injury was caused

to the complainant party. Even nothing has been pointed out as to which public property was damaged. As per allegations in the FIR, 40-50

persons duly armed with lathies and dandas entered the school premises and gave beatings but how the investigating officer came to the conclusion

that the Petitioners were the persons who caused injuries and gave beatings to the complainant party. Moreover, a complaint was made by some

official, who was on election duty but it has also not been disclosed by him as to how he came to know with regard to identity of the Petitioners.

6. In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned above and the fact that since the Petitioners have joined the investigation, recovery has also

been effected and no injury was caused to the complainant, interim directions issued by this Court on 7.10.2010 are made absolute. However, the

Petitioners shall abide by the conditions envisaged u/s 438(2) Code of Criminal Procedure

Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

From The Blog
Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Read More
Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Read More