K. Kannan, J.@mdashIn the petition filed u/s 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act by the appellants seeking for compensation for death of the boy aged 20, the Tribunal took the income at Rs. 3,000/- per month, made a 1/3rd deduction but applied a multiplier of 8 on the basis of age of the parents. If the deceased''s annual earning was less than Rs. 40,000/- and a provision is invoked u/s 163-A, it shall be impermissible for a Court to apply any other formula than what is given in Schedule II. Schedule II provides a uniform rate of application of multiplier to be dependant on the age of deceased. This provision was found certain curtain several mistakes by judgment of the Supreme Court in
Krishan and Another Vs Sukhdev Singh and Others
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced
Judgement Snapshot
Case Number
First Appeal from Order No. 4081 of 2011 (O and M)
Hon'ble Bench
K. Kannan, J
Advocates
K.S. Malik-I, for the Appellant; Vishal Aggarwal, for the Respondent
Final Decision
Allowed
Acts Referred
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 163A
Judgement Text
Translate: