🖨️ Print / Download PDF

Sandeep Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar @ Seepu Vs State of Punjab

Case No: Criminal Miscellaneous No. M 29878 of

Date of Decision: Nov. 15, 2010

Acts Referred: Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438#Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 201, 302, 34

Hon'ble Judges: Nirmaljit Kaur, J

Bench: Single Bench

Translate: English | हिन्दी | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | ಕನ್ನಡ | मराठी

Judgement

Nirmaljit Kaur, J.@mdashThis is a petition u/s 438 Cr.P.C for grant of pre-arrest bail to the Petitioner in FIR No. 129 dated 15.10.2009

registered under Sections 302/201/34 IPC registered at Police Station Lambra, District Jalandhar.

2. It is contended that the Petitioner was found innocent in two enquiries held by the police. Accordingly, notice of motion was issued and it was

directed that the enquiry conducted by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala be produced.

3. Learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions from ASI Jarnail Singh, states that there is no report of Deputy Superintendent of Police,

Kapurthala as no enquiry was conducted by him. It is further stated that as per the investigation, the Petitioner was found to be last seen with the

deceased and four other cases are also pending against the present Petitioner in Police Station Division No. 7, Jalandhar and P.O. proceedings

have also been initiated against him.

4. Accordingly, no ground for concession of anticipatory bail is made out.

Dismissed.