Gurpreet Kaur and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 7 Dec 2010 Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-35921 of 2010 (2010) 12 P&H CK 0566
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-35921 of 2010

Hon'ble Bench

S.S. Saron, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

S.S. Saron, J.@mdashThe Petitioners on their own solemnized their marriage amongst themselves. The marriage was solemnized at Pracheen Gugga Mari Ram Krishan Mandir, Sector 19-D, Chandigarh on 03.12.2010. The Pandit of the said Mandir performed the marriage as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. The marriage certificate dated 03.12.2010 (Annexure P5) issued by the Pandit of Pracheen Gugga Mari Ram Krishan Mandir, Sector 19-D, Chandigarh and the photographs (Annexure P6) taken at the time of marriage have been placed on record. On account of the marriage that has been solemnized the Petitioners apprehend danger to their life and liberty from Respondents No. 5 and 6 who are the parents of Petitioner No. 1. The Petitioners also submitted an application dated 03.12.2010 (Annexure P7) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda (Respondent No. 2) for protecting their life and liberty which is in danger from the parents (Respondents No. 5 and 6) of Petitioner No. 1. Despite the said application, the threat to them persists. As such, they have filed the present petition.

2. It is stated that both the Petitioners are major. The date of birth of Petitioner No. 1 as per her middle standard examination certificate (Annexure P1) issued by the Punjab School Education Board is 15.8.1988 and that of Petitioner No. 2 as per his middle standard examination certificate (Annexure P2) issued by the aforesaid Board is 22.9.1988. The averments made in the petition are supported by affidavit of Gurpreet Kaur (Petitioner No. 1). It is stated by Naveen Kumar (Petitioner No. 2) that he is working as a Diesel Supervisor in Shim Info Company Private Limited.

3. Both the Petitioners are present in Court and are identified by their counsel. It is stated by Petitioner No. 1 that she has solemnized her marriage with Petitioner No. 2 of her own free will and desire and without any kind of pressure or undue influence. She is happy with her marriage. It is also stated by the Petitioners that they are not earlier married.

4. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of with a direction to Respondents No. 2 to 4 that in case the Petitioners approach any of them setting out their grievances as have been made in the present petition, the same would be looked into by them independently and in accordance with law.

From The Blog
CJI Gavai Rebukes Government Over Tribunal Reforms Act Adjournment Plea
Nov
08
2025

Court News

CJI Gavai Rebukes Government Over Tribunal Reforms Act Adjournment Plea
Read More
Supreme Court Orders Full Disclosure of Convictions: Non-Disclosure Will Lead to Disqualification
Nov
08
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Orders Full Disclosure of Convictions: Non-Disclosure Will Lead to Disqualification
Read More