Malkiat Kaur Vs Ram Kishan and Others

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 4 Sep 2013 C.R. No. 5191 of 2009 (O and M) (2013) 09 P&H CK 0503
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

C.R. No. 5191 of 2009 (O and M)

Hon'ble Bench

Laxmi Narain Mittal, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

L.N. Mittal, J.

CM No. 1349-CII of 2011

1. The application is allowed and Annexure P-9 is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.

Main Case

Objector-Malkiat Kaur has filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning order dated 31.07.2009 passed by the executing Court thereby dismissing third party objections Annexure P-2 preferred by the petitioner in execution petition, which has been instituted by respondents No. 1 and 2/decree holders against respondent No. 3-judgment debtor. I have heard counsel for the parties regarding maintainability of the revision petition and perused the case file.

2. In view of Order 21 Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure, impugned order has the same force as a decree and is subject to the same conditions as to appeal or otherwise. Consequently, the impugned order is appealable and therefore, the instant revision petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, without going into merits of the case, the instant revision petition is dismissed as not maintainable, with liberty to the petitioner to prefer appeal against the impugned order of the executing Court.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More