Ranchhodbhai Valavbhai Vs The Collector of Kaira

Bombay High Court 1 Feb 1909 (1909) 02 BOM CK 0003
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Heaton, J; Chandavarkar, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. Following the ruling in Laxmi horn Tatya v. Aba bin Appaji 10 Bom. L.R. 924 : 32 B. 634 the reasoning of which applies to the facts of the present case, we must hold that no appeal lies to this Court from the order of the Assistant Judge, but that the appeal lies to the District Court. We, therefore, return the appeal for presentation to the District Court.

2. The respondent must have his costs of this appeal.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: No Formal Demand Notice Needed for Industrial Disputes; Sham Contract Allegations Must Be Heard
Jan
30
2026

Court News

Supreme Court: No Formal Demand Notice Needed for Industrial Disputes; Sham Contract Allegations Must Be Heard
Read More
Supreme Court Orders Inclusion of 49 HIMSR PG Seats in NEET-PG Counselling 2025–26
Jan
30
2026

Court News

Supreme Court Orders Inclusion of 49 HIMSR PG Seats in NEET-PG Counselling 2025–26
Read More