Ranchhodbhai Valavbhai Vs The Collector of Kaira

Bombay High Court 1 Feb 1909 (1909) 02 BOM CK 0003
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Heaton, J; Chandavarkar, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. Following the ruling in Laxmi horn Tatya v. Aba bin Appaji 10 Bom. L.R. 924 : 32 B. 634 the reasoning of which applies to the facts of the present case, we must hold that no appeal lies to this Court from the order of the Assistant Judge, but that the appeal lies to the District Court. We, therefore, return the appeal for presentation to the District Court.

2. The respondent must have his costs of this appeal.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Read More
Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Read More