In Re: Kalyan Kumar Bose (Deceased)

Calcutta High Court 4 Apr 2013 G.A. No. 3327 of 2012 and P.L.A. No. 180 of 2012 (2013) 5 CHN 648 : (2013) 3 WBLR 211
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

G.A. No. 3327 of 2012 and P.L.A. No. 180 of 2012

Hon'ble Bench

Indra Prasanna Mukerji, J

Advocates

Anirban Roy, for the Appellant;

Acts Referred

Succession Act, 1925 — Section 213(2)

Judgement Text

Translate:

Indra Prasanna Mukerji, J.@mdashAn application for grant of probate of the Will of an Indian Christian, Kalyan Kumar Bose, deceased (PLA

No. 160 of 2012) was made ready and filed by the Advocates-on-Record for the executor and petitioner, M/s. Khaitan & Co. Court fee of Rs.

50.000;- was paid at the time of filing of the application.

2. Thereafter, the Advocates-on-Record realised that an application for grant of probate of a Will of an Indian Christian was not required at all by

virtue of Section 213(2) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

3. By this application the executor of the Will prays for refund of the Court fees.

4. Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J. in Dr. Apala Chakraborty v. The District Judge, North 24 Parganas, Dr. Apala Chakraborty Vs. The District Judge,

North 24 Parganas, Barasat, put it so wonderfully that the power to order refund of court fee was inherent power of the Court. It was exercised to

do real and substantial justice between the parties. Such power could be exercised, inter alia, when the court fee was paid by mistake. Moreover,

his Lordship said that the court fees were paid on the grant and not on the application.

5. There is no doubt that in this case court fee was paid on a bona fide mistaken view of the law. Equally important is that on the basis of this

judgment the payment of court fees, pending grant, is to be taken as provisional. Unless there is grant of probate there is no vested right in the

State to receive the fees. In my opinion, this kind of a mistake is one of the grounds when the Court can exercise this inherent power to do justice.

6. Hence, following the dictum laid down by his Lordship in the above case, I allow this application by passing an order in terms of prayer (a) of

the Notice of Motion. The application for grant of probate, PLA No. 180 of 2012, is dismissed as withdrawn.

7. The Registrar, Original Side will issue the necessary certificate under Rule 8 Chapter VIA of the Original Side Rules upon production of the

original stamps or stamp paper representing payment of court fees. Registrar, Original Side and all parties are to act on a signed photocopy of this

order on the usual undertakings.

From The Blog
SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Read More
SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Read More