SUNIL KUMAR Vs STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS

DELHI HIGH COURT 3 May 2018 CRL.REV.P. 97 of 2018 (2018) 05 DEL CK 0032
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CRL.REV.P. 97 of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

SANJEEV SACHDEVA

Advocates

Harshit Jain,Neelam Sharma

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138, 147

Judgement Text

Translate:

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

Crl. M. (Bail) 220/2018 (suspension of sentence)

1.The petitioner impugns judgment dated 19.10.2016 whereby the appeal of the petitioner impugning judgment dated 22.06.2015 and order on sentence

dated 26.06.2015 in a complaint case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, was dismissed in default by the appellate court.Â

2.The respondent had filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner was held guilty and sentenced to undergo

simple imprisonment of 9 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 3.50 lakhs within 30 days and in default to further undergo simple imprisonment of 60

days.Â

3.On 21.03.2018 statement of respondent was recorded that respondent was agreeable to compounding of offence on receipt of the amount of Rs.

2.60 lakhs which was deposited by the petitioner with the trial court. The original cheque amount which was subject matter of the complaint case was

of Rs. 2 lakhs.Â

4.In terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Damodar S. Prabhu versus Sayed Babalal H., (2010) 5 SCC 663, this Court on 21.03.2018

accepting the submissions of counsel for the petitioner as well as respondent/complainant, directed the petitioner to deposit 15% of the cheque amount

with the Delhi Legal Service Authority (DLSA). The trial court was further directed to release the said amount of Rs. 2.60 lakhs in favour of the

respondent.Â

5.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cost amounting to Rs. 30,000/- being 15% of the cheque amount has been deposited with the

DLSA on 03.05.2015. Original Receipt has been produced in court for perusal.

6.He further confirms that the said amount of Rs. 2.60 lakhs has been released by the trial court to respondent.Â

7.In view of the above and in view of the statement made by the counsel for the respondent on 21.03.2018 under instructions from Mrs. Suraj Kanta

Bhashkar R-2 (I), the subject offence is compounded in terms of Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner is accordingly

acquitted of the said offence.Â

8.The petition is disposed of in the above terms. The original receipt shall be filed before the Trial Court.Â

9.Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. Â

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More