Gaurav Thapar & Ors Vs State Through Govt Of Nct Of Delhi

Delhi High Court 5 Nov 2019 Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 2714 Of 2019 (2019) 11 DEL CK 0054
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 2714 Of 2019

Hon'ble Bench

Suresh Kumar Kait, J

Advocates

Aparna, Izhar Ahmed, Shilpi

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 34, 406, 498A

Judgement Text

Translate:

Suresh Kumar Kait, J

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking directions thereby quashing the FIR No.192/2008 registered at P.S. Roop Nagar for the offences

punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

3. Learned APP accepts the notice on behalf of the State and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up

for final disposal.

4. The present petition has been filed on the ground that the petitioners and the respondent no.2 have amicably settled all their disputes with the

intervention of elders, relative and friends. Thus, the respondent no.2 does not want to pursue the present case against the petitioners, any further.

5. The Respondent no.2, who is present in the Court, has been identified by the I.O. SI Ranvir Singh, states that her marriage with the petitioner no.1

has already been dissolved on 03.12.2018 and since she has got fed up with this case, which is going on since 2008, therefore, she does not wish to

pursue the same. She therefore, has requested this Court to quash the aforementioned FIR with the proceedings emanating therefrom.

6. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State submits that if this Court is inclined to quash the FIR, heavy costs may be imposed on the petitioner

as the present case was registered way back in the year 2008 due to which the government machinery came into motion and a lot of valuable public

time has been wasted. The police conducted investigation and filed the charge sheet, charges have been framed against the petitioners and the case is

pending for prosecution evidence. It is also submitted that the respondent no.2 has already been examined.

7. Since the respondent no.2 does not wish to pursue the present case against the petitioners, therefore, while allowing the petition and quashing the

aforementioned FIR, I hereby find force in the submissions of the learned APP for the State regarding imposition of costs. Accordingly, while

quashing the FIR No.192/2008 registered at P.S. Roop Nagar, I hereby impose a cost ofR s. 50,000/- each upon the petitioners. The said cost amount

shall be paid in favour of the Blind School, Kingsway Camp, New Delhi for the welfare of the inmates of the school.

8. In view of the above, the petition is allowed and FIR No.192/2008, registered at P.S. Roop Nagar for the offences punishable under Sections

498A/406/34 IPC and proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.

9. The cost imposed shall be paid within a period of two weeks from today, failing which the Registrar General of this Court shall ensure recovery of

the cost amount from the petitioners, as per law.

10. Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More