ABC Vs Union Of India & Anr

Delhi High Court 7 Dec 2020 Civil Writ Petition No. 9804 Of 2020 (2020) 12 DEL CK 0094
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Civil Writ Petition No. 9804 Of 2020

Hon'ble Bench

Dhirubhai Naranbhai Patel, CJ; Prateek Jalan, J

Advocates

Ravinder Pal Jindal, Rahul Sharma, C.K.Bhatt

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

D.N.Patel, CJ

Proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

C.M.No.31251/2020 (exemptions)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.9804/2020

1. This writ petition has been preferred with the following prayers:-

“1. Mandamus directing and commanding the respondents to consider the representation dated 15.07.2019;

2. Issue directions to the respondents to constitute a committee so as to consider the case of the petitioner in a time-bound period;

3. Any other appropriate writ, order and/ or direction in the facts and circumstances of the case as this Hon'ble Court may deem just and

equitable. â€​

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the petitioner had supplied

certain intelligence input to the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence, Delhi Zonal Unit. The said intelligence supplied by the petitioner

was found to be true and correct. A detailed order-in-original dated 30.06.2016 was passed. The intelligence as supplied by the petitioner ultimately

resulted in recovery of huge amount of tax, penalty etc. Now, the grievance of the petitioner is that as per the reward policy floated by the

respondents (which is at Annexure A-6 to the memo of this writ petition), the reward as stipulated has not been paid to him.

3. We, therefore, direct the learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish the details of the petitioner along with the representation filed by the petitioner

to the learned counsel who is appearing for respondent No.1, in a sealed cover. The learned counsel for respondent No.1, in turn, shall supply the said

details to the concerned respondent authorities in a sealed cover.

4. The representation will be decided by the concerned respondent authorities in accordance with law, rules, regulations and Government policies

applicable to the facts of the case and on the basis of materials on record, as expeditiously as possible and practicable.

5. With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More