Ramnarain Roy Chowdhury and Another Vs Biswanath Banerjee

Calcutta High Court 13 Jan 1928 (1928) 01 CAL CK 0034
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Zahid Suhrawardy, J; Graham, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. We think that in this matter the proper order to be passed is this: The examination of the petitioner (defendant No. 2 in the suit) will be postponed till the evidence on the side of the plaintiff is closed. Then if the petitioner does not offer herself for examination an the side of the defendants, the plaintiff will be at, liberty to examine her, as his witness. The learned Counsel for the petitioners gives an undertaking that she will be available at Dacca for examination by the plaintiff at the stage that we have indicated. By this order we do not mean to suggest; that he must necessarily be examined. The Rule is made absolute in these terms.

2. The costs of the "Rule will be costs in the cause. We assess the hearing fee at five gold mohurs.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Quashes Bihar PSC’s Retrospective Recruitment Rule Change, Protects Candidates’ Rights
Jan
09
2026

Court News

Supreme Court Quashes Bihar PSC’s Retrospective Recruitment Rule Change, Protects Candidates’ Rights
Read More
Madras High Court Bans Book with Scandalous Remarks Against Judge, Orders Contempt Action Against Publisher
Jan
09
2026

Court News

Madras High Court Bans Book with Scandalous Remarks Against Judge, Orders Contempt Action Against Publisher
Read More