Ramnarain Roy Chowdhury and Another Vs Biswanath Banerjee

Calcutta High Court 13 Jan 1928 (1928) 01 CAL CK 0034
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Zahid Suhrawardy, J; Graham, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. We think that in this matter the proper order to be passed is this: The examination of the petitioner (defendant No. 2 in the suit) will be postponed till the evidence on the side of the plaintiff is closed. Then if the petitioner does not offer herself for examination an the side of the defendants, the plaintiff will be at, liberty to examine her, as his witness. The learned Counsel for the petitioners gives an undertaking that she will be available at Dacca for examination by the plaintiff at the stage that we have indicated. By this order we do not mean to suggest; that he must necessarily be examined. The Rule is made absolute in these terms.

2. The costs of the "Rule will be costs in the cause. We assess the hearing fee at five gold mohurs.

From The Blog
Delhi HC Frozen Semen Case: Govt Challenges Order Allowing Parents to Inherit Dead Son’s Gametes, Legal Vacuum in Indian Law Exposed
Feb
02
2026

Court News

Delhi HC Frozen Semen Case: Govt Challenges Order Allowing Parents to Inherit Dead Son’s Gametes, Legal Vacuum in Indian Law Exposed
Read More
Budget 2026: New Tax Rules for Sovereign Gold Bonds Limit Exemption to Original Buyers Holding till Maturity
Feb
02
2026

Court News

Budget 2026: New Tax Rules for Sovereign Gold Bonds Limit Exemption to Original Buyers Holding till Maturity
Read More