SPML Infra Limited Vs Delhi Jal Board

Delhi High Court 1 Aug 2024 O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 559 Of 2024 and IA 35094 Of 2024 (2024) 08 DEL CK 0034
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 559 Of 2024 and IA 35094 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

C.Hari Shankar, J

Advocates

Parag Chaturvedi, Abhishek Verma, Karunesh Tandon

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 29A(5)

Judgement Text

Translate:

 C.Hari Shankar, J

1. This is a petition under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 “the 1996 Act”, hereinafter seeking extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal, which is scheduled to expire on 31 August 2024.

2. Mr. Karunesh Tandon, learned counsel for the respondent, strenuously opposes this petition and submits that the only ground on which the extension of the mandate is being sought is that the counsel who is to argue the matter on behalf of the petitioner is not available on 3 August 2024, when the matter is next listed.

3. Mr. Parag Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondent has also earlier taken adjournments.

4. In this view of the matter, without entering into this imbroglio, I am inclined to extend the mandate of the learned Arbitrator for three months with effect from 31 August 2024.

5. The petition stands allowed in the aforesaid extent.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More