Amid (Hamid) Ali and Others Vs Abdul Mea Mozumdar and Others

Calcutta High Court 3 Aug 1917 (1917) 08 CAL CK 0055
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Newbould, J; Fletcher, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. This appeal must fail on the findings of fact made by the learned Judge of the lower Appellate Court. It is quite clear that, on those facts, the plaintiffs'' document being registered within the time limited by the Registration Act had priority over the document under which the defendants claimed.

2. It is urged also that the interest was penal. No issue was raised on this point and the point does not arise for our decision. In any event, this contract about interest, in the absence of any evidence of extortion or that the interest itself is so high that it amounts to extortion, is a valid contract.

3. The appeal fails and is dismissed with costs.

From The Blog
J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Dec
08
2025

Court News

J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Read More
ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Dec
08
2025

Court News

ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Read More