In Re: Celica Developers P. Ltd. (No. 1) and Others

Calcutta High Court 29 Mar 2007 C.A. No. 259 of 2007 (2007) 03 CAL CK 0019
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

C.A. No. 259 of 2007

Hon'ble Bench

Indira Banerjee, J

Advocates

Manju Bhuteria, for the Appellant;

Acts Referred
  • Companies Act, 1956 - Section 391(1), 393

Judgement Text

Translate:

Indira Banerjee, J.@mdashIn this application under Sections 391(1) and 393 of the Companies Act, 1956, summons for directions were taken out for dispensing with the meetings of the shareholders of the applicants.

2. The prayer is allowed, since the written consent of all the shareholders of the applicant-company have been annexed in original to the affidavit in support of the summons.''

3. Summons be signed as on date.

4. The application is thus disposed of.

5. Urgent certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Clarifies: Insult Under SC/ST Act Must Be Linked to Victim’s Caste Identity
Feb
09
2026

Court News

Supreme Court Clarifies: Insult Under SC/ST Act Must Be Linked to Victim’s Caste Identity
Read More
Supreme Court: Accused on Bail Need Not Appear in Every Criminal Appeal Hearing
Feb
09
2026

Court News

Supreme Court: Accused on Bail Need Not Appear in Every Criminal Appeal Hearing
Read More