K.K. Santha Vs The District Magistrate Wayanad District, Civil Station, Kalpetta Pin 673121 and Others

High Court Of Kerala 12 Sep 2012 Writ Petition (C) . No. 18182 of 2012 (W) (2012) 09 KL CK 0065
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) . No. 18182 of 2012 (W)

Hon'ble Bench

T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J

Advocates

A.V. James, Sri. P. Dalbi Emmanuel, Sri. O.S. Jafarkhan, Smt. C.C. Jancy, for the Appellant; T.I. Abdul Salam, Government Pleader for R1 to R6, for the Respondent

Acts Referred
  • Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Section 144, 144(2)

Judgement Text

Translate:

T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.@mdashThis writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging Ext. P7 order issued by the District Magistrate invoking the power u/s 144 Cr.P.C. By the said order the District Magistrate prohibited the enshrining ceremony and festival of Thoduvetty Sree Bhagavathy Kudumbakshetram Temple managed by the Thoduvetty Kudumbakshetram Trust with a direction to the District Police Chief, Wayanad to implement the prohibitory order. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said order has not been extended further, which is confirmed by the learned Government Pleader.

2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner belongs to Hindu Vishwakarama community. She is a widow. She is having a family temple namely; Thoduvetty Sree Bhagavathy Kudumbakshetram along with her house. She is an oracle ( ). Various other details have been stated in paragraph 1 of the writ petition. It is submitted that the place thronged by devotees every day. The temple was existing for a period of more than 27 years. Once in a year a festival and special pooja are conducted. For that purpose lot of devotees from various parts of the district are participating. A Trust has also been registered and Ext. P3 is the copy of the deed.

3. Ext. P7 order was passed by the District Magistrate when the festival of this year was to be conducted on 29-12-2012. It is submitted that there was an objection from the 7th and 8th respondents in the matter. 4-4-2012 was fixed as the next day for conducting the festival, but the same could not be conducted, in the light of the issuance of Ext. P7.

4. Provisions of section 144(2) Cr.P.C. show that the order will be in force for a period of two months. Proviso confers power on the Government to extend the period. In this case nothing of that sort has happened. In the light of the above, the petitioner can move the District Collector and District Magistrate pointing out the change of circumstances, who will get appropriate reports from the Revenue authorities as well as from respondents 3 to 6 and appropriate decision will be taken, in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner and respondents 7 and 8.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More