Shrinath Chandra Pramanick and Others Vs Secretary of State for India in Council

Calcutta High Court 20 Dec 1909 (1909) 12 CAL CK 0011

Judgement Snapshot

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. No one appearing for the Opposite Party, we think that these Rules must be made absolute; The order of the lower; Court, appears to be incorrect, having Regard to the provisions of Section 7 Sub-section (4), Clause (c) of the Court Fees Act. In these suits, not only is a declaratory decree sought but consequential relief by amendment of the record-of-rights is also asked for. In such cases, the Court-fees, in terms of that section, must be determined by the amounts at which the reliefs sought are valued is the plaints and not at the sum of ten rupees required for a declaratory decree. We, therefore, direct that the order complained of be set aside and the cases sent back to the lower Court for re-admission after it has determined the amounts at which the reliefs sought are to be valued and after the institution fees or those valuations have been paid. We make no order as to costs.

From The Blog
ITAT Ahmedabad Rules: Calculation Error in Section 54F Exemption Not Tax Misreporting
Nov
29
2025

Court News

ITAT Ahmedabad Rules: Calculation Error in Section 54F Exemption Not Tax Misreporting
Read More
Delhi High Court Refuses to De-Freeze Bank Account, Cites Concealment in ₹19.39 Crore GST ITC Fraud Probe
Nov
29
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Refuses to De-Freeze Bank Account, Cites Concealment in ₹19.39 Crore GST ITC Fraud Probe
Read More