K.S. Rajeev Vs Sreedevi S.K.

High Court Of Kerala 2 Aug 2010 Writ Petition (C) No. 22808 of 2010 (R) (2010) 08 KL CK 0170
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 22808 of 2010 (R)

Hon'ble Bench

M.L. Joseph Francis, J; K.M. Joseph, J

Advocates

P.V. Anil, for the Appellant; No Appearance, for the Respondent

Judgement Text

Translate:

K.M. Joseph, J.@mdashPetitioner seeks the following reliefs:

a). That a writ of mandamus or other order or direction be passed directing the Hon''ble Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram to dispose of Exhibit P4 filed by the petitioner within a time to be fixed by this Hon''ble Court.

b). That a writ of mandamus or other be passed directing the Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram to pass orders on Exhibit P7 within a time to be fixed by this Hon''ble Court.

2. This Court ordered that a report be placed. Accordingly, the Family Court has given a report. In the report it is inter alia stated as follows:

It is true that the petitioner has filed I.A 906/2010 on 23.4.2010 seeking to include the case in the special list for trial. But the filing of that I.A was brought to my notice only on 1.6.10 and on that date I have posted that I.A to 3.7.2010 for objection of the opposite side. But on that date the opposite has not filed any objection. Hence the I.A posted for objection with N.F.T. order to 7.8.2010. The above I.A will be considered immediately after filing objection if any and will be disposed of on merit on 7.8.10 and if I am convinced that there is extreme urgency in the matter I will definitely included the O.P in the special list and will be disposed of on merit within 3 months from 7.8.2010 if both sides co-operate.

I may further submit that out of 3560 cases the parties involved in about 75% of the cases are young couples and they used to express urgency in disposing of their cases and if the urgent matter alone is considered, time will not be available to start trial of oldest and targeted cases which will include cases pending trial for the last 17 years onwards (cases filed during the year 1993 onwards is pending for trial). Therefore, I used to give preference to the oldest cases and also the cases included in the target so as to avoid complaints by the parties and counsels appearing in the oldest cases.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is real urgency. In view of the fact that the Family Court has also stated that upon being convinced of the extreme urgency the matter will be included in the special list and dispose of within three months if both sides co-operate, we dispose of the writ petition by taking note of the report as indicated above.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More