Preeti Yohannan Vs Abraham K. Mathen

High Court Of Kerala 26 Jun 2012 Un Number TP (C) No....... of 2012 (2012) 06 KL CK 0161
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Un Number TP (C) No....... of 2012

Hon'ble Bench

V. Chitambaresh, J

Advocates

Philip T. Varghese, Sri Thomas T. Varghese and Smt. Achu Subha Abraham, for the Appellant;

Acts Referred
  • Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) - Section 24

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

Mr. Justice V. Chitambaresh

1. The Registry has noted a defect and has objected to the numbering of the Transfer Petition (Civil) filed u/s 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The objection is that separate petitions need to be filed to transfer independent proceedings pending in the court below. The petitioner seeks transfer of the following proceedings from the Family Court, Nedumangad to the Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram.

(i) O.P. No. 630/2012 filed for dissolution of marriage.

(ii) O.P. No. 488/2012 filed for declaration of guardianship.

(iii) O.P. No. 527/2012 filed for recovery of money and articles.

(iv) O.P. No. 636/2012 filed for custody of minor child.

The High Court Rules, 1971 (Kerala) of course do not specify as to whether separate petitions should be filed for transfer of independent proceedings. But we get the necessary cue from the Civil Rules of Practice (Kerala) though they are intended to regulate the procedure in the Subordinate Civil Court in the State. The relevant rule therein is as follows:

57.Application for transfer.-

(1)***

(2)***

(3) A separate application shall be presented in respect of each suit, appeal or other proceedings of which transfer is sought.

The power to transfer u/s 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is exercised not only by the District Court but also the High Court. It will be anomalous to permit a consolidated petition to be moved in the High Court when separate petitions are insisted in the District Court.

2. Instances are many where a consolidated petition for transfer is filed even though the parties are different in the proceedings merely because a few of them are common. Separate petitions for transfer of independent suit, appeal or proceeding is essential to adjudge the need set forth in the same.Different considerations prevail for transfer of independent proceedings even if they have a common nexus and the finding in one has a bearing in another. The contention that all procedure should be deemed to have been permitted unless prohibited in the High Court Rules, 1971 (Kerala) does not at all impress me. The objection raised by the Registry is sustained. The Registry shall return the Transfer Petition (Civil) to the petitioner for representation after appropriate correction.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Allows Landlady to Evict Tenant for Husband’s Dry Fruit Business, Affirms Bona Fide Requirement Under Rent Control Act
Nov
20
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Allows Landlady to Evict Tenant for Husband’s Dry Fruit Business, Affirms Bona Fide Requirement Under Rent Control Act
Read More
Delhi High Court Issues Permanent Injunction in Anjana Om Kashyap Deepfake Case, Strengthens Protection Against Digital Impersonation
Nov
20
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Issues Permanent Injunction in Anjana Om Kashyap Deepfake Case, Strengthens Protection Against Digital Impersonation
Read More