P. Geetha Pillai Vs State of Kerala, Sub Treasury Officer and Accountant General of Kerala (A and E)

High Court Of Kerala 29 Nov 2010 Writ Petition (C) No. 34123 of 2010 (M)
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 34123 of 2010 (M)

Hon'ble Bench

S. Siri Jagan, J

Advocates

R. Azad Babu, for the Appellant; No Appearance, for the Respondent

Judgement Text

Translate:

S. Siri Jagan, J.@mdashThe petitioner is the daughter of late V.S. Thankappan Pillai who died on 02.05.1983, while working as a Peon in the

Public Works Department of the Government of Kerala. She was an unmarried daughter at that time. So family pension was sanctioned to her and

was being credited in an account with the Treasury maintained for that purpose. She got married on 31.01.2010. According to the Petitioner, the

account had a balance of about Rs. 80,000/- at that time. To defray certain expenses in connection with her marriage, the Petitioner issued a

cheque for Rs. 75,500/- in that account. That was not honoured by the 2nd Respondent. It is under the above circumstances the Petitioner has

filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs:

a) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the Respondents to disburse the pension arrears due to

the Petitioner accumulated till 31.1.2010

2. learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that, as per rules, an unmarried daughter is eligible for family pension only up to 25 years of

age, which the Petitioner has crossed as early as in 2007. For payment of family pension beyond 25 years of age, the Petitioner has to get sanction

from the Government producing a certificate certifying that, the Petitioner is not having any other source of income. Without noticing the above fact,

family pension continued to be credited to the Petitioner''s account, which was detected only now and that is why the cheque issued by the

Petitioner was not honoured is his submission.

3. Petitioner submits that, along with Ext.P1 representation, such a certificate was produced. The learned Government Pleader points out that, that

was submitted only on 16.04.2010 and therefore it is yet to be considered.

4. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st Respondent to consider the matter and take a decision as

to whether the Petitioner is entitled to continue payment of family pension till the date of her marriage as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within

a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In the meanwhile, if in the account of the Petitioner, amounts are

outstanding till she attained 25 years and if the Petitioner issues a cheque for that amount, the same shall be honoured and paid.

From The Blog
Bhim Singh, MLA vs State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others (1985)
Oct
18
2025

Landmark Judgements

Bhim Singh, MLA vs State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others (1985)
Read More
The Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. vs The State of Rajasthan and Others (1962)
Oct
18
2025

Landmark Judgements

The Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. vs The State of Rajasthan and Others (1962)
Read More