Vivek S.A. Vs The Kerala Public Commission and Others

High Court Of Kerala 9 Oct 2007 W.A. No. 595 of 2006 (2007) 10 KL CK 0070
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

W.A. No. 595 of 2006

Hon'ble Bench

Sasidharan Nambiar, J; K.S. Radhakrishnan, J

Advocates

K. Ramakumar, for the Appellant; George Kuruvilla, Alexander Thomas, SC and Benny Gervacis, GP, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Kerala Vocational Higher Secondary Education State Service Rules, 2004 - Rule 5

Judgement Text

Translate:

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.@mdashWrit Petition was preferred by the appellant herein seeking a declaration that Rule 5 of the Rules for the Kerala Vocational Higher Secondary State Service 2004 prescribing 23 years as the minimum age limit for appointment to the post of Vocational Teacher is illegal and unconstitutional and also for other consequential reliefs.

2. Kerala Public Service Commission published a notification inviting applications for the post of Vocational teacher in Textile Technology (Textile Weaving and Textile Dying and Printing). Petitioner also preferred an application pursuant to the above mentioned notification. However, his application was rejected by the Public Service Commission by its order dated 25-07-2005 on the ground that the petitioner did not satisfy the 23 years of age prescribed in the Special Rules and the notification, as on 1-1-2004. Aggrieved by the same petitioner has approached this court. Learned single Judge found no infirmity in the Rule and dismissed the writ petition against which this appeal has been preferred.

3. Government of Kerala in consultation with the Kerala Public Service Commission framed Special Rules for the Kerala Vocational Higher Secondary Education Subordinate Service and Kerala Vocational Higher Secondary Education State Service 2004 The pests of Vocational Teacher and Non Vocational Teacher are included in the Kerala Vocational Higher Educational Service. Age limit prescribed for the above post is that "no person shall be eligible for appointment by direct recruitment if he has not completed 23 years of age and has completed 39 years on the first day of January in which the applications for appointment are ii invited.

4. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that fixation of age limit is arbitrary and unwarranted and there is no justification in not entertaining the application of the petitioner. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the second respondent in the appeal stating that educational qualifications for each post are prescribed on the basis of job recruitments and the age qualification for the posts were also fixed after assessing the duration of each course included in the rules and the period of time required for the successful completion of the courses. Lower limit of age for a post is fixed to the minimum age of the and date in completed years for acquiring the required qualifications in the education system. It is stated that the qualification presented for the post in Vocational Higher Secondary Education should be one acquired after a regular course of studies from a recognised University in Kerala. It is stated that the Government have fixed the lower age limit of 23 years for appointment to the post of Vocational Teacher considering the facts and doing full justice to those who have acquired the qualification. Rule 5 of the Kerala Vocational Higher Secondary Education State Service Rules 2004 is extracted hereunder for easy reference.

5. Age Limit-No person shall be eligible for appointment by direct recruitment to the categories shown in column (1) of the table below if he has not completed the minimum age shown in column (2) or if has completed the maximum age shown in column (3) on the first day of January of the year in which the application for appointment are invited. Usual relaxation in upper age limit shall be allowed to candidates belonging to the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classed.

From The Blog
Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Read More
Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Read More